Sandstone Premium InsightsBETA
Powered bySandstone Insights
BHP Group Limited (BHP)
HOLD

Megatrending

1H23 RESULT

Sector: Materials
Megatrending

Need To Know

  • Underlying EBITDA -5% below consensus at US$13.2bn
  • Lower commodity prices, good cost control and higher inflation main earnings influencers
  • Lower dividend US90cps as expected, payment 30 March

Lower commodity prices accounted for most of the drop in earnings compared to last year’s bumper result. Regardless, despite much higher costs and rampant inflation, BHP delivered another excellent set of numbers as the organisation continues to slim down. More coal assets are on the way out as the ‘future facing metals’ strategy evolves.

Iron ore prices averaged US$85.46/wmt in 1H23, down from US$113.54/t in 1H22. This accounted for US$3.6bn of the fall in EBITDA to US$7.6bn in the period. The higher cost theme was prevalent here as unit costs pushed up 13% to US$18.30/t, or US$15.50/t on a C1 cost basis. Higher diesel prices and inflation plus an inventory drawdown due to labour shortages all detracted from the result. Chinese steel production is at an ebb and the outlook is uncertain on demand for seaborne iron ore. BHP WAIO production for FY23 is unchanged at 278-290mt (100% basis) with medium term guidance till over 300mtpa (studying options for 330mtpa).

Copper prices averaged US$3.49/lb in 1H23, well down on US$4.32/lb in 1H22. Higher volumes from Escondida and better performance at the Spence operation contributed positively but could only offset about half the price decline. Unit cost climbed 12% to US$1.44/lb, also reflecting higher diesel, acid and explosives costs.

Coal earnings landed near last year’s outcome with EBITDA at US$2.6bn. The Queensland Government stuck its snout in the royalties trough and was a key reason why the coal division result could have been better. The higher royalty rates, now the highest in the world, together with higher thermal coal prices subtracted $545m from the divisional EBITDA. BHP has previously divested its 80% interest in the BHP Mitsui joint venture (US$1.35bn, completion mid 2022) and will follow this with the sale of the Daunia and Blackwater mines which produce about one quarter of the BMA joint venture (BHP/Mitsubishi 50/50). Thermal coal prices averaged US$354/t compared to US$137/t in 1H22, but hard coking coal was roughly the same price at US$270/t for the period. Unit cost of production at BMA has risen to just over US$100/t and BHP sees the full year average between US$100-105/t. The horror run of wet weather in NSW shunted unit costs up 49% to US$101/t, partly because BHP was chasing higher calorific value coal given the price premium over lower value coal.

Financials. Net operating cash flow of US$6.8bn was enough to pay the US$3.5bn capex bill and fork out a US$4.6bn dividend to shareholders. Net debt at 31 December 2022 was US$6.9bn, a gearing ratio of 12.9%. 

The Queensland Government royalty rate decision and the NSW Government coal price cap and reservation requirement decision have given BHP sufficient reason to effectively stymie any further spending on parts of its coal assets. The Daunia and Blackwater sales (BMA) and the potential sale of Mt Arthur in the Hunter Valley are collateral damage due to poor government policy decisions.

In contrast, the acquisition of OZ Minerals for A$9.8bn will complement the Olympic Dam and Oak Dam projects in the South Australian precinct.  

Investment View

Copper prices fell sharply late in FY22, frazzled by the state of world geopolitics, but have since stabilised. There are two big picture factors to bear in mind with regards to the global copper market. Traditional end-use demand is steady. The new mega-trend of electrification (not just vehicles) is going to consume vast amounts of copper in the (near) future.

BHP earns more than half its revenue through sales to China (RIO>50%, FMG ~99%). As China re-opens its economy and winds back its COVID restrictions, there is an expectation that industrial activity will reignite and perhaps offset the softer demand developing elsewhere as economic growth slows on higher interest rates. Iron ore prices have rallied steadily on this premise providing some offset to higher operating costs.

BHP still represents an excellent exposure to the global decarbonisation theme and has a sharper portfolio of assets to achieve success. The gradual excision of underperforming assets has been handled well. An EBITDA multiple around 5.5x and PER of 11x is a fair reflection of BHP’s prospects. 

Risks to Investment View

Demand and prices for commodities could decline, or operational costs could rise more than expected. There is heightened geopolitical risk currently and inflation is a key operational concern. 

Recommendation

We have retained our Hold recommendation.

Figure 1: UNDERLYING EBITDA (US$M)

Figure 2: CONSENSUS ESTIMATES

Figure 3: AVERAGE COMMODITY PRICES

Figure 4: CAPITAL ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK

Stock Overview

Key Properties

Financial Forecasts

Share Price

Company Overview

BHP Group is a global commodities producer including iron ore, metallurgical coal, copper, gold, silver, uranium oxide, lead, zinc, cobalt, molybdenum, manganese, and potash.

Disclaimers and Disclosures

Issuer

The information and opinions contained within Sandstone Insights Research were prepared by MST Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 54 617 475 180, AFSL 500557) ("MST").

Reliance

Whilst MST make every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information in the construction of its reports, MST make no representation, warranty or undertaking of the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of information in this report. Save for any statutory liability that cannot be excluded, MST and MST employees, representative and agents shall not be liable (whether in negligence or otherwise) for any error or inaccuracy in, or omission from, this advice or any resulting loss suffered by the recipient or any other person.

General Advice

Any advice contained within Sandstone Insights Research is general advice only and has been prepared without taking into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Any person, before acting on any advice contained within Sandstone Insights Research, should first consider consulting with a financial adviser to assess whether that advice is appropriate for their objectives, financial situation and needs. 

General Disclosures

This report should be read in conjunction with MST Disclaimers and Disclosures and is published in accordance with MST Conflict Management Policy which are available on the MST website: https://www.sandstoneinsights.com.au

Currency of Research

The recommendations made in a Sandstone Insights Research report are current as of the publication date. If you are reading a report materially after publication, it is likely that circumstances will have changed and at least some aspects of the analysis may no longer hold.

Access and Use

Any access to or use of Sandstone Insights Research is subject to the Terms of Use. By accessing or using Sandstone Insights Research you hereby agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions and hereby liable for any monies due in payment of accessing this service. In addition you consent to us collecting and using your personal data (including cookies) in accordance with MST Privacy Policy, including for the purpose of a) setting your preferences and b) collecting readership data so MST may deliver an improved and personalised service to you. If you do not agree to MST Terms of Use and/or if you do not wish to consent to MST use of your personal data, please do not access this service.

Equities Research Methodology

Please click here for information about MST equities research methodology.